Executive Dashboard
Portfolio-wide anti-money-laundering and fraud position for the monitoring window 28 Apr 2026 to 27 Jul 2026. Every figure is derived from the synthetic dataset shipped with this prototype.
Total Players
200
1,502 transactions monitored
Total Deposits
$8.3M
Gaming turnover $14.5M
Total Withdrawals
$6.1M
74% of deposited funds paid out
High-Risk Players
22
Accounts scoring 50 or above (High or Critical)
Open AML Alerts
29
43 alerts raised in total
Connected Suspicious Accounts
32
Across 10 connected-account clusters
Suspicious Account Networks
10
Clusters sharing devices, addresses or payment instruments
Est. Investigation Hours Saved
103 h
Assumes 3h manual triage against 0.6h assisted, across 43 alerts
Daily Deposit and Withdrawal Volume
Value of money in and money out per day across the monitoring window.
Alerts by Scenario
Headline typology assigned to each alert by the rule engine.
Alerts by Risk Level
Alert queue split by scored severity band.
Player Risk Distribution
Every monitored account scored, not only those that raised an alert.
Alert Status
Where the current queue sits in the investigation workflow.
Highest Priority Alerts
Work the queue from the top. Select an alert to open the investigation workspace.
- Clara Marchetti (P-1197)PEP Match · NetherlandsCritical· 100
- Nikolai Vance (P-1104)Money Mule Pattern · CanadaCritical· 95
- Amelia Aguilar (P-1105)Money Mule Pattern · VietnamCritical· 95
- Kian Nair (P-1132)Money Mule Pattern · PanamaCritical· 90
- Tomas Rivas (P-1102)Money Mule Pattern · AustraliaCritical· 85
Key Risk Findings
Computed from the current dataset. Each finding can be traced back to the accounts behind it.
Rapid deposit and withdrawal activity increased by 300%
4 accounts requested a withdrawal within 60 minutes of a deposit; 4 of them in the second half of the monitoring window against 1 in the first half.
5 accounts are connected through shared identifiers
NET-01 is the largest cluster: 5 accounts connected through 1 × device, 1 × ip address, 2 × payment card, 1 × crypto wallet. Network risk score 100.
25 high-value accounts have unexplained source-of-funds patterns
Deposits in a rolling 30 day window exceed ten times the customer's declared monthly income on accounts depositing more than $25,000.
10 accounts show low gaming activity against high withdrawal values
Gaming turnover is below 20% of deposits while withdrawals exceed $10,000 — the profile of an account being used to move money rather than to play.
12 payment instruments are shared between accounts
The same card, bank account or crypto wallet funds or receives money for more than one registered account.
Built-in Investigation Scenarios
Seven cases are deliberately planted in the synthetic population. Use them to drive the demonstration.
Scenario 1 — Rapid Deposit and Withdrawal
Deposits of $50,000 across three payment methods in 24 hours, $2,000 wagered, $47,500 withdrawn 35 minutes after the final deposit.
P-1048
Scenario 2 — Multiple Linked Accounts
Five accounts share one mobile device, one IP address, two payment instruments and a crypto wallet.
P-1101, P-1102, P-1103, P-1104, P-1105
Scenario 3 — Structuring
Six deposits of $9,800 placed within 24 hours, each just below the $10,000 reporting threshold.
P-1067
Scenario 4 — Bonus Abuse Ring
Four linked accounts claim the same welcome promotion from one device and withdraw the proceeds.
P-1130, P-1131, P-1132, P-1133
Scenario 5 — Money Mule Network
One funding account deposits, value moves through gaming activity, three connected accounts withdraw to third-party instruments.
P-1150, P-1151, P-1152, P-1153
Scenario 6 — Income Mismatch
Declared income of $3,000 per month against $120,000 of deposits inside one week.
P-1082
Scenario 7 — Possible Chip Dumping
Two connected accounts play head to head repeatedly, with value moving consistently in one direction.
P-1170, P-1171